ufsaudi.blogg.se

Second law of thermodynamics and evolution
Second law of thermodynamics and evolution





second law of thermodynamics and evolution second law of thermodynamics and evolution second law of thermodynamics and evolution

It is anti science! Then, with the first cell enters evolution itself which boosts the process from bacteria to biologists! The naturalistic evolutionary system is shooting time's arrow backward. The religion of naturalism, however, sees the universe as having become more and more organized, from a tiny chaotic plasma to a first living cell. Isaac Asimov, an evolutionist himself, wrote: "Another way of stating the Second Law, then is: The universe is constantly getting more disorganized. Is defined by the evolutionary magazine Discover: "a measure of the tendency toward disorder in a thermodynamic system." Among other things, it describes the general tendency to run down and become more random. This law is sometimes expressed as entropy, or as time's arrow, or as the ultimate Murphy's Law. This general upward tendency toward greater complexity and organization is in contrast with one of the most important and fundamental laws of science, the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Living things today have far greater organization than non living chemicals or bacteria, just as the universe became more complex and organized than the tiny point that Big Banged. The general direction of the whole process is from tiny point of plasma to you from very simple to very complex. From that point on, evolution was up and running, producing fish, dinosaurs and us. One of them includes our solar system! On earth a simple cell, it is claimed, developed from non living chemicals which resulted from the Big Bang. Notice the direction in which naturalism and then evolution are going, beginning either from an explosion of nothing, or of a terribly tiny point, galaxies evolve. It's repeated like a mantra in the media, in lawsuits against schools, and in materials that promote evolution.Īccording to my dictionary the principle definition of religion is, "a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe," so while evolution fits the definition of a religion it is not science in the sense that chemistry and physics are science.Įvolution = Millions Of Years + Your Imagination Creationism and intelligent design are religion and have no place in the science class." You have probably read or heard it too. In spite of the facts I frequently read: "Evolution is science and should be taught in science classes. The idea that all of them did is a purely faith based belief system. Evolutionists believe that the basic categories of living things had already evolved long before history began to be written so there is no recorded observational evidence that any basic kind of animal evolved from another. It involves events that cannot be repeated or reproduced in the laboratory, so it does not depend on science in the usual sense of the word.







Second law of thermodynamics and evolution